Business

Central Bank of India Q1 net profit rises 33% to ₹1,169 crore


State-owned Central Bank of India on Saturday (July 19, 2025) posted a 33% growth in net profit at ₹1,169 crore during the first quarter of this financial year, aided by improvement in core income and decline in bad debts.

The Mumbai-based bank had earned a net profit of ₹880 crore in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year.

The total income rose to ₹10,374 crore during the June quarter of 2025-26, from ₹9,500 crore in the same quarter of FY25, Central Bank of India said in a regulatory filing.

Interest earned by the bank improved to ₹8,589 crore, as compared to ₹8,335 crore in the June quarter of FY25.

During the period under review, operating profit of the bank increased to ₹2,304 crore, as compared to ₹1,933 crore in the same quarter a year ago.

The bank’s asset quality showed improvement as gross non-performing assets (NPAs) declined to 3.13% of gross advances at the end of the June quarter, from 4.54% a year ago.

Gross advances increased by 9.97% to ₹2,75,595 crore from ₹2,50,615 crore at the end of June 2024.

Similarly, net NPAs, or bad loans, declined to 0.49%, as against 0.73% in the year-ago period.

As a result, provisions and contingencies halved to ₹521 crore during the first quarter as compared to ₹1,191 crore in the same period a year ago.

Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR) improved to 97.02% from 96.17%, an improvement of 85 basis points.

At the same time, Return on Assets (ROA) improved to 1.02% for June 2025, from 0.82% in June 2024, registering an improvement of 20 bps, it said.

Capital adequacy ratio of the bank rose to 17.6%, from 15.6% in the same quarter of FY25.

Total business grew by 10.84% to ₹7,04,485 crore from ₹6,35,564 crore at the end of June 2024.



Source link

Wind industry players call for phased approach in government’s localisation timeline 


The domestic wind energy sector has voiced operational concerns regarding a recent draft amendment by the Ministry of New & Renewable Energy’s (MNRE) towards boosting domestic manufacturing.

The draft mandates rapid localisation of key wind turbine components for inclusion in the Revised List of Models and Manufacturers (RLMM).

Industry players said a phased and industry-aligned approach could avoid potential supply chain bottlenecks and significant cost increases.

The two-year timeline for indigenisation could create unintended hurdles in supply chains, delay project rollouts, and potentially escalate project costs by over 35%, they said.

Many critical sub-components such as gearboxes, bearings, converters, and control systems are currently imported.

An immediate localisation mandate, without adequate phase-outs, may discourage foreign OEMs and slow project rollout timelines, they stated.

“India is at a pivotal juncture in its wind energy journey. For component manufacturers like us, the momentum toward 500 GW of renewable capacity presents significant opportunities—from global supply chain shifts post-COVID to the growing push for localisation,” said V Sriniwas Reddy, Executive Director, Synergy Green Industries Ltd.

“However, policy execution must balance ambition with realism. The recent MNRE directive on indigenisation, while well-intentioned, needs a phased, industry-aligned approach,” he said.

Stating that precision parts like gearboxes and converters require not just capex, but tech partnerships and skilled talent, he said the ministry instead of blanket targets, should focus on enabling quality manufacturing, selective localisation, and global competitiveness.

“A National Wind Industrial Cluster Policy—with plug-and-play infrastructure and shared R&D—is the kind of reform that will truly empower the ecosystem. The way forward is through collaboration: OEMs, component makers, and policymakers aligning for long-term, scalable, and export-ready growth,” he said.

“India has the potential to become the world’s third-largest wind market—but only if we prioritize quality, investor confidence, and global integration over short-term mandates,” he added.

Francis Jayasury, Director -India, Global Wind Energy Council India – GWEC India said, “India’s renewable energy ambitions present a remarkable opportunity for domestic turbine component manufacturers like us—but success will depend on how smartly we align industrial growth with policy execution.”

“Our Chennai facility is already geared for scale and meets global quality benchmarks, but we face challenges from subsidized imports, fragmented tariffs, and the absence of mandatory standards for key components like anchor cages,” he said.

“We welcome the MNRE’s push for indigenisation—it plays to our strengths—but urge that it be implemented through a phased, industry-aligned framework. Not every component needs to be made locally; smart localisation, not forced isolation, should guide our strategy,” he emphasised.

“The focus must be on full utilisation of existing domestic capacity, while partnering globally for highly specialized technologies.

If India wants to become a true global wind manufacturing hub, what we need is certainty: clear HS code classifications, BIS standards for structural components, and export-linked incentives,” he said.

A unified framework would not only boost production and exports but also build long-term investor confidence in the sector, he pointed out.

Published – July 19, 2025 10:15 pm IST



Source link

Union Bank of India logs 12% rise in net to ₹4,116 crore in Q1


A logo of Union Bank of India. File | Photo Credit: Reuters

A logo of Union Bank of India. File | Photo Credit: Reuters

State-owned Union Bank of India on Saturday (July 19, 2025) reported a 12% rise in net profit to ₹4,116 crore during the first quarter of this financial year.

The Mumbai-based lender had earned a net profit of ₹3,679 crore in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year.

The total income rose to ₹31,791 crore during the June 2025 quarter from ₹30,874 crore in the year-ago period, Union Bank of India said in a regulatory filing.

Interest earned by the bank improved to ₹27,296 crore compared to ₹26,364 crore in the June quarter of FY25.

However, net interest income declined to ₹9,113 crore during the quarter against ₹9,412 crore a year ago.

The bank’s operating profit also dropped 11% to ₹6,909 crore from ₹7,785 crore in the same quarter of the preceding fiscal.

The bank’s asset quality showed improvement as gross non-performing assets (NPAs) declined to 3.52% of gross advances at the end of the June quarter from 4.54% a year ago.

Its gross advance increased by 6.83% to ₹9,74,489 crore from ₹9,12,214 crore at the end of June 2024.

Similarly, its net NPAs, or bad loans, declined to 0.62% against 0.90% in the year-ago period.

As a result, provisions for bad loans declined to ₹1,153 crore during the first quarter compared to ₹1,651 crore a year ago.

Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR) improved to 94.65% from 93.49%, an improvement of 116 bps.

At the same time, Return on Assets (ROA) rose to 1.11% for June 2025, from 1.06% in June 2024, registering an improvement of 5 bps, the lender said.

Capital adequacy ratio of the bank rose to 18.3% from 17.02% in the same quarter of FY25.

The total business grew by 5% to ₹22,14,422 crore from ₹21,08,762 crore at the end of June 2024.



Source link

Textile industry seeks uniform GST rate


The textile industry is pitching for a fibre-neutral GST at 5% for the entire textile and apparel value chain.

The textile industry is pitching for a fibre-neutral GST at 5% for the entire textile and apparel value chain.
| Photo Credit: SAMUEL RAJKUMAR

The textile industry is pitching for a fibre-neutral GST at 5% for the entire textile and apparel value chain.

Currently, cotton-based textile sector has 5% GST, except for garments priced above ₹1,000. These garments attract 12% duty. However, in the Man Made Fibre (MMF) sector, the GST on PTA (Purified Terephthalic Acid) and MEG (Monoethylene Glycol) that are critical raw materials for polyester production is 18%, MMF filament and spun yarn attract 12% duty, fabric and garments are at5 %, and garments and fabric priced above Rs. 1,000 a piece are at 12%.

There should be no inverted duty structure and there should be a fibre-neutral rate which is the lowest in the GST slabs, said RK Vij, secretary general of Polyester Textiles Apparel Industry Association.

If the industry should achieve the target of $100 billion annual exports and $250 billion domestic sales by 2030, all sectors of the textile industry should grow. For now, there is no major expansion in the pipeline for three years in the viscose sector and the cotton sector is not growing. The growth of the MMF sector is crucial and hence, the government should rationalise the GST rates for this sector, right from the raw material stage, he said.

According to K. Selvaraju, secretary general of the Southern India Mills Association, garments and fabric priced above ₹2,000 should be levied 12% duty and for the other products across the textile value chain, be it cotton, viscose, or polyester, the rate should be 5%. The micro, small and medium-scale enterprises are struggling when funds are blocked in tax paid for inputs. MMF-based fabric and garment are the most affordable for the common man. And, hence, MMF sector should also be brought under uniform 5% duty. Further, textile and apparel sector is the highest job-generating industry and it should attract investments to create more jobs. Rationalisation of the GST rates will help make investments viable, he said.



Source link

ICICI Bank Q1 net profit rises 16% to ₹12,768 crore


The consolidated profit after tax of the bank increased by 15.9% YoY to ₹13,558 crore.

The consolidated profit after tax of the bank increased by 15.9% YoY to ₹13,558 crore.
| Photo Credit: FRANCIS MASCARENHAS

ICICI Bank, India’s second-largest private sector bank, for the first quarter ended June 30, reported a 15.5% growth in net profit to ₹12,768 crore compared with ₹11,059 crore a year earlier. 

Net interest income (NI) increased by 10.6% Year on Year (YoY) to ₹ 21,635 crore from ₹19,553 crore a year earlier.

Net interest margin was 4.34% compared with 4.36% in the year ago period.

Treasury gains were ₹1,241 crore as compared with ₹613 crore a year ago primarily reflecting realised and mark-to-market gains in fixed income securities and equities.

Provisions (excluding provision for tax) were ₹1,815 crore and included the impact of release of Alternative Investment Fund (AlF)-related provisions of ₹389 crore.

The net domestic advances grew by 12% YoY. The retail loan portfolio grew by 6.9% YoY and comprised 52.2% of the total loan portfolio at June 30, 2025.

 Including non-fund outstanding, the retail portfolio was 43.2% of the total portfolio at June 30, 2025. The business banking portfolio grew by 29.7% YoY, the bank said.

Total period-end deposits increased by 12.8% YoY to ₹16,08,517 crore.

The gross NPA additions were ₹6,245 crore in Q1-2026 compared with ₹5,916 crore in the year ago period.

Recoveries and upgrades of NPAs, excluding write-offs and sale, were ₹3,211 crore as compared with ₹3,292 crore a year ago.

The net additions to gross NPAs, excluding write-offs and sale, were ₹3,034 crore compared to ₹2,624 crore a year ago.

 The bank has written-off gross NPAs amounting to ₹2,359 crore in the quarter.

The provisioning coverage ratio on non-performing loans was 75.3% at June 30.

Excluding NPAs, the total fund based outstanding to all borrowers under resolution as per the various extant regulations/guidelines declined to ₹1,788 crore or about 0.1% of total advances at June 30, 2025 compared to ₹1,956 crore at March 31, 2025 and ₹2,735 crore at June 30, 2024.

At June 30, 2025, the bank holds total provisions, other than specific provisions on fund-based outstanding to borrowers classified as non-performing, amounting to ₹22,664 crore.

These provisions include the contingency provisions of ₹13,100 crore as well as general provision on standard assets, provisions held for non-fund based outstanding to borrowers classified as non-performing, loan and non-fund based outstanding to standard borrowers under resolution and the BB and below portfolio.

Including profits for Q1-2026, the bank’s total capital adequacy ratio at June 30, 2025 was 16.97%. The consolidated profit after tax of the bank increased by 15.9% YoY to ₹13,558 crore. Consolidated assets grew by 10.9% YoY to ₹26,68,636 crore.



Source link

Byju’s founders’ threat of defamation case an attempt to distract from facts: Glas Trust


Byju Raveendran, founder of Byju’s.

Byju Raveendran, founder of Byju’s.
| Photo Credit: AFP

U.S.-based lender agent Glas Trust has alleged that Byju’s founders’ plan to file a defamation case is an attempt to distract from the facts after several court orders against them.

The legal counsel of Byju’s founders, J Michael McNutt, rejected the allegations levelled by Glas Trust, calling it “incomplete and misleading”.

The counsel of Byju’s founders, Byju Raveendran and Divya Gokulnath, on Thursday (July 17, 2025) said they are gearing up to file an over $2.5 billion suit against Glas Trust and others for damage to their reputation and business.

“Byju Raveendran’s latest act of threatening defamation claims against GLAS Trust and the Term Loan B Lenders is a transparent attempt to distract from the facts, coming on the heels of a U.S. federal court holding him in contempt. The fact of the matter is that every court to consider the issues has ruled against Mr. Raveendran and his cohorts,” Glas Trust said.

Glas Trust Company LLC is the trustee for lenders to whom Byju’s owes $1.2 billion. Byju’s founders have, however, contested Glas Trust claims.

Glas Trust now controls Byju’s Alpha, which was a special-purpose financing vehicle established by the edtech firm to receive Term Loan B funds.

Byju’s Alpha has filed a lawsuit against Byju Raveendran, his co-founder and wife Divya Gokulnath, and his consigliere Anita Kishore, alleging that each of them co-orchestrated and executed a lawless scheme to conceal and steal $533 million of loan proceeds.

Glas Trust said judgments exceeding $533 million have been entered against Raveendran’s allies, “including for their fraudulent conduct”.

“Raveendran’s brother was found by a Delaware federal court to be untruthful and one of the most incompetent directors in Delaware’s history. A Delaware federal court stated its intention to make a criminal referral when Raveendran attempted to bribe a witness and had held Raveendran in contempt,” Glas Trust alleged.

The U.S. lenders’ agent said that it has at all times acted within its rights.

“Mr. Raveendran’s threats are desperate and meritless, and the irony of Mr Raveendran threatening to sue for defamation when he continues to unlawfully conceal what happened to the missing $533 million should be lost on no one,” Glas Trust said.

McNutt alleged that GLAS Trust continues to distract from the true situation in India.

“It is incorrect to claim that U.S. Courts have ruled against Raveendran and his ‘co-horts’ on the relevant issues. The proceedings in Delaware against Byju have only just commenced, and Byju has not even submitted his response to the complaint,” the counsel said.

McNutt said Byju Raveendran has not been found guilty of any wrongdoing by any court, in any jurisdiction, and the contempt order against Byju is being contested.

He said that the term ‘co-horts” is misleading and offensive.

McNutt alleged that the order against Think & Learn, its subsidiary and Byju Raveendran’s brother (a director of Think & learn who is suspended due to bankruptcy in India) was without any legal representation.

Glas Trust initiated legal proceedings against Byju’s and its founders in U.S. courts.

The agent of U.S.-based lenders also approached the Supreme Court of India to challenge the dismissal of the insolvency case against Byju’s by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in an appeal filed by BCCI.

The apex court ruled in favour of Glas Trust, and the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) litigation against Byju’s is going on.

Byju’s founders are contesting the case and filed a plea to remove the Interim Resolution Professional, alleging his link with Glas Trust through the consultancy firm EY.



Source link

India-EFTA trade pact to be implemented from October 1: Piyush Goyal


The Free Trade Agreement between India and the four-nation European bloc EFTA will be implemented from October 1, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said on Saturday (July 19, 2025).

The two sides signed the Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) on March 10, 2024.

Under the pact, India has received an investment commitment of $100 billion in 15 years from the grouping while allowing several products, such as Swiss watches, chocolates, and cut and polished diamonds, at lower or zero duties.

“India-EFTA TEPA to come into effect from 1st October,” Mr. Goyal said in a post on X.

The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) members are Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland.

The bloc has committed an investment of $100 billion — $50 billion within 10 years after the implementation of the agreement and another $50 billion in the next five years — which would facilitate the creation of 1 million direct jobs in India.

This is a first-of-its-kind pledge agreed upon in any of the trade deals signed by India so far.

The commitment is the key substance of the agreement, which took almost 16 years to conclude, for India in return for opening its markets for several products coming from the EFTA nations.

The biggest trading partner of India in the bloc is Switzerland.

India has low trade volumes with the remaining three countries.

In the pact, India is offering 82.7% of its tariff lines or product categories, which cover 95.3% of EFTA exports, of which more than 80% of imports are gold.

Domestic customers will get access to high-quality Swiss products, such as watches, chocolates, biscuits, and clocks, at lower prices as India will phase out customs duties under the trade pact on these goods over 10 years.

In the services sector, the Commerce Ministry has earlier stated that India has offered 105 sub-sectors to the EFTA, like accounting, business services, computer services, distribution and health.

On the other hand, the country has secured commitments in 128 sub-sectors from Switzerland, 114 from Norway, 107 from Liechtenstein, and 110 from Iceland.

Segments, where Indian services will get a boost, include legal, audio-visual, R&D, computer, accounting, and auditing.

Further, the pact would provide an opportunity for domestic exporters to integrate into the EU (European Union) markets. Over 40% of Switzerland’s global services exports are to the EU. Indian companies can look to Switzerland as a base for extending their market reach to the EU.

India-EFTA two-way trade was $24.4 billion in 2024-25.

On the tariff negotiations with the U.S., Mr. Goyal said, “Our negotiations strategy hinges on national interest. At no point of time will the Narendra Modi government ever allow national interest to be compromised”.

At the Assocham First Managing Committee Meeting FY2025-26 in Mumbai, the Minister said the world is recognising India’s strength today, and added that “the world is recognising that talent and skill are in India”. And that is what gives us that negotiation leverage”.

Stating that India is negotiating with advanced or developed countries, he said, “We are not trying to do trade deals or focus only on trade deals without competitors. We are looking at complementary economies”.

Later, talking to reporters on the sidelines of the event, Mr. Goyal said that countries which do not take care of their supply chains and ensure that supply chains are resilient will “suffer”.

“… I think India has huge domestic demand. We have imports coming into the country, which can be replaced by developing a domestic industry to scale for high-quality production,” he noted.

And ultimately, COVID taught us a big lesson, the minister said, adding that “the ban on the export of permanent magnets or fertiliser that has been imposed in the last few months teaches us a big lesson”.

Published – July 19, 2025 05:28 pm IST



Source link

HDFC Bank approves its first-ever bonus share; special dividend of ₹5 per share


The overall provisions jumped to ₹14,442 crore from ₹2,602 crore in the year-ago period, the bank said, adding that this includes a floating provision of ₹9,000 crore. File

The overall provisions jumped to ₹14,442 crore from ₹2,602 crore in the year-ago period, the bank said, adding that this includes a floating provision of ₹9,000 crore. File
| Photo Credit: Reuters

HDFC Bank on Saturday (July 19, 2025) posted a 1.31% decline in its consolidated net profit to ₹16,258 crore for the June 2025 quarter.

The lender had reported a net profit of ₹16,475 crore in the year-ago period.

On a standalone basis, the country’s largest private sector lender reported a net profit of ₹18,155 crore for the reporting quarter, up from ₹16,174 crore a year ago.

Its total income jumped to ₹99,200 crore in the June quarter from ₹83,701 crore in the year-ago period.

The total expenditure stood at ₹63,467 crore against ₹59,817 crore in the same period of the preceding fiscal year, as per an exchange filing.

The net interest margin narrowed to 3.35% from 3.46% in the preceding quarter, it said.

The overall provisions jumped to ₹14,442 crore from ₹2,602 crore in the year-ago period, the bank said, adding that this includes a floating provision of ₹9,000 crore.

The private lender also approved its first-ever bonus share issue on Saturday (July 19, 2025), meaning each of its shareholders will be eligible to receive an extra bonus share for every share held. The date of issuance is still to be determined, the bank said.

In a bonus issue, a company distributes additional stock to shareholders as a proportion of their holdings at no cost. It is typically a sign of confidence in financial performance and growth trajectory.

The board has also approved a special dividend of 5 rupees per share.



Source link

Yes Bank Q1 net profit surges 59% to ₹801 crore


Photo: Special Arrangement

Photo: Special Arrangement

Yes Bank Ltd for the first quarter ended June 30, 2025 reported 59% growth in net profit at ₹ 801 crore over the year ago period. 

Net Interest Income (NII) for the quarter at ₹2,371 crore grew 5.7% YoY aided by reduction in cost of funds. 

Net Interest Margin (NIM) for Q1FY26 at 2.5% trended upward YoY.

Provision costs (Non-Tax) at ₹284 crore for Q1FY26 grew 34% Y-o-Y.

Net advances at ₹ 2,41,024 crore for the quarter grew 5% YoY.

Total deposits at ₹ 275,843 crore grew 4.1% YoY.

GNPA Ratio at 1.6% in Q1FY26 was down 10 bps YoY, the bank said.

NNPA Ratio at 0.3% in Q1FY26 was down 20 bps YoY

Gross slippages for Q1FY26 was at ₹ 1,458 crore (2.4% of Advances) as compared wity ₹ 1,223 crore (2.0% of Advances) in Q4FY25.

“Resolution momentum continues to be strong with Total Recoveries & Upgrades for Q1FY26 at ₹1,170 crore,” the bank said.

Prashant Kumar, Managing Director & CEO, Yes Bank said, “The bank entered the new financial year on a strong footing and delivered a robust performance.”

“Asset quality remained stable,” he added. 



Source link